Isn't Rand Paul a valuable litmus test? I'm not saying that disagreeing with any given politician proves one thing or another about a person, but if you look at the bipartisan list of people who have been screaming themselves purple about the junior senator from Kentucky–Bruni,John McCain, Lawrence O'Donnell, William Kristol, Garrett Epps, Michael Gerson, John Yoo–you quickly detect one important trait in common: They are all reliable apologists for the government exercise of power. While the particular power being championed may vary, and the tenor of the argument will change depending on which political party is exercising it this season, the truism remains that Rand Paul poses a direct challenge to people who get irritated when there's any obstruction between their goals and government's ability to pursue them.
For that and other reasons, Paul is not only the most interesting man in the Senate, but I think the most interesting player in American politics today.
Thursday, March 28, 2013
The Rand Paul Litmus Test
Matt Welch at Reason may be on to something:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment